Watershed Neighbor Networks
| 1 Comment
Summary:
We think our neighbor network approach "flips" the usual paradigm. Typically, a program or project or education campaign is created by an organization and then a base of volunteers is recruited to support it with the "program" at the center.
We think the people should be at the center. By building a base of organized “neighbors” (who take on the identity of citizens responsible for governing their actions that impact water quality - an identity deeper than "volunteer") we focus on our citizen role, on building our stewardship capacity, our ownership in addressing this complex issue, and on developing an ongoing social structure needed for neighbors to collaborate on community-wide phosphorus source reduction. Neighbor networks reframe watershed stewardship as a "community and civic practice".
Putting people at the center lets us leverage the wealth of resources already available, but which at the moment lack coordination. A neighbor network serves as a community hub through which we access the many watershed educational materials that abound, the innovative tools, projects and programs developed by other orgs, and contribute what we are learning. Freshwater Society taught us their organics cleanup model, for example. Because of our base of organized neighbors our "Curbside Cleanup" was hugely successful (see impact). Through a neighbor network we can sort through these resources, tweak them to fit our local situation,add our own skills and talents, and take action that yields results. In the process we provide information on what works at the neighborhood level.
We see our neighbor network as distinct from a lake association or a "friends of" nonprofit, which put the lake or river at the center. We are focused FIRST on neighbors - on defining our role as residents, citizens, stewards. Como Lake may be the beneficiary, but it is our capacity to take care of the watershed collectively that is the key to restoring our lake to health.
About You
About You
First Name
Janna
Last Name
Caywood
Country
United States, MN, Ramsey County
City
Saint Paul
About Your Organization
Organization Name
Como Lake Neighbor Network
Organization Website
http://www.clnn.org
Your Idea
Name your idea
Watershed Neighbor Networks
Describe how you would use $15,000 to help your community become aware of and address water issues in Minnesota.
Imagine if every community in Minnesota had a "watershed neighbor network". That is, an organized base of neighbors who:
*Learn together about the condition of their local lake or river;
*Help each other implement lake or river-friendly home projects or practices;
*Organize citizen-led, neighborhood-wide events in which residents work as a community to prevent pollutants from the watershed from entering local waters;
*Work in partnership with government, nonprofits, educational institutions, and businesses in protecting and restoring local waters.
Now imagine all those watershed neighbor networks linked, forming a statewide web of watershed literate, collaborating communities capable of dramatically reducing “non-point” runoff, the greatest water quality challenge of our generation. The results would be phenomenal.
My neighbors and I are inspired by this vision and have taken the first step by forming the Como Lake Neighbor Network (CLNN) in Saint Paul. We have the beginnings of a good idea we think. And feel the methods we have used so far to organize ourselves and engage other neighbors are effective and could have wide-spread impact.
We want to use $15,000 to create a large neighbor network “demonstration project” – to fully flesh out an effective organizing model, show the impact an organized base of neighbors can have on local water issues, and demonstrate the public CAN be a valuable partner with government in managing our water resources and in tackling the conundrum of non-point source pollution.
We think if we tripled the number of households in our network from 18 to 60 this would give us a solid base. We then could test our organizing model with sister communities, distill it to uncover the essential elements, and share the framework with other communities, which they could adapt to their own circumstances. We then could seek future funding to build our vision of a statewide web of linked watershed neighbor networks!
How do you define your "community"?. How are water issues affecting your community?
We are neighbors living in the Como neighborhood of Saint Paul, so our community and the water body we are concerned about is place-based.
Our community's most resonating water challenge is the poor condition of our neighborhood lake, Como Lake. Like many of the urban lakes and rivers across Minnesota, Como Lake is impaired due to excessive concentrations of phosphorus. This is fueling an explosion of plant growth – noxious algae being the most harmful – that's unnatural, even for a shallow lake. This imbalance harms not only the wildlife, it also disrupts our lake’s ability to “stabilize.” In time beautiful Como Lake could become a swamp.
To prevent this travesty, we need to “turn off the faucet” of phosphorus that’s washing into our lake every year via our neighborhood storm sewers – a dramatic reduction of 60%, our watershed district tells us. Primarily the phosphorus comes from leaves, grass clippings, fertilizer and sediment that's carried from our neighborhood yards and streets into our stormwater drains by wind and rain.
Our watershed district and the cities that own the storm sewers that empty to Como Lake have installed several structures that help “settle out” or filter some organics. But these alone are not enough to restore our lake. To get beyond the tipping point, a critical mass of residents are needed to prevent phosphorus at the source. Examples include cleaning up organics from curbs and storm drains; installing rain gardens, diverting downspouts from hard surfaces, improving an impacted lawn.
We think this challenge is really an opportunity in disguise - to demonstrate the critical role the public can and must play in addressing "non-point source" pollution, our state's most vexing water quality dilemma. Supportive structures at the neighborhood level - such as a neighbor network - allow us to learn, to problem-solve, and take action collaboratively.
Innovation
Describe how your idea is creative.
We think our neighbor network approach "flips" the usual paradigm. Typically, a program or project or education campaign is created by an organization and then a base of volunteers is recruited to support it with the "program" at the center.
We think the people should be at the center. By building a base of organized “neighbors” (who take on the identity of citizens responsible for governing their actions that impact water quality - an identity deeper than "volunteer") we focus on our citizen role, on building our stewardship capacity, our ownership in addressing this complex issue, and on developing an ongoing social structure needed for neighbors to collaborate on community-wide phosphorus source reduction. Neighbor networks reframe watershed stewardship as a "community and civic practice".
Putting people at the center lets us leverage the wealth of resources already available, but which at the moment lack coordination. A neighbor network serves as a community hub through which we access the many watershed educational materials that abound, the innovative tools, projects and programs developed by other orgs, and contribute what we are learning. Freshwater Society taught us their organics cleanup model, for example. Because of our base of organized neighbors our "Curbside Cleanup" was hugely successful (see impact). Through a neighbor network we can sort through these resources, tweak them to fit our local situation,add our own skills and talents, and take action that yields results. In the process we provide information on what works at the neighborhood level.
We see our neighbor network as distinct from a lake association or a "friends of" nonprofit, which put the lake or river at the center. We are focused FIRST on neighbors - on defining our role as residents, citizens, stewards. Como Lake may be the beneficiary, but it is our capacity to take care of the watershed collectively that is the key to restoring our lake to health.
Impact
Describe how how you expect your idea to make a difference in your community.
We feel having a neighbor network does in fact have an impact on the ability of a community to synchronize and maximize their pollution prevention efforts. Even with our small network, in the past year we’ve engaged over 100 Como neighbors from a 40 block area east of the lake to prevent a LOT of organic debris from our storm drains and Como Lake – over 700 garbage bags full! Freshwater Society taught us the cleanup model, which we've tweaked to make it ultra local, and added lots of partners to make it fun.
We feel this proves there's great potential in the neighbor network organizing model and that we could demonstrate this further by increasing the households in our network and spreading our efforts beyond the east side of the lake.
Youth partners are also key. Youth Outdoors from Conservation Corps MN and the Enviro Studies AP seniors from Como Park Sr. High took great interest in our curbside organics cleanups and joined us last year. We expect to add the U of M Water Resource Students in Action to our fall 2011 efforts. And we've developed great partnerships with our watershed district, the city of saint paul, como community council, and a few local businesses. This too has much potential for broader impact.
A neighbor network also provides social impacts. Several network members have said they enjoy the community building and neighborliness that comes from having our neighbor network just as much as they feel rewarded by their efforts to help our lake. The social reward keeps people engaged.
The ultimate impact is the confidence and competence a neighbor network allows us to build as citizens in a democracy. We CAN understand complex issue, problem-solve together, and come up with a "public" solution for restoring a "public good". In this way we think we are having an impact on our own definition of citizenship, defining a clear, meaningful, and authentic role for citizens in taking care of our precious water resources.
Sustainability and Growth
Describe how your idea will "stick" in your community and how you think it could be repeated in other communities.
To sustain engagement in our neighbor network, we are mindful that our neighbors want to be part of something meaningful. It is not enough to simply suggest people engage in a practice because it's "green." So we intend to frame our efforts in terms of a broader yet locally relevant vision - to link our activities in the watershed to the health of our lake, the health of our neighborhood, and the health of our democracy.
We think many communities would benefit from a neighbor network that helps them organize and collaborate more easily within their watershed. Something simple to set up and that draws on many resources already developed by other orgs. We want to hone the model and determine a framework of essential elements so that other communities can replicate and adapt it to their local context.
Our long-term vision would be neighbor networks emerging in communities across the state, but that are linked to each other. Perhaps an online hub could be created to facilitate cross-pollination between communities and resource sharing statewide, a gateway to other websites with tools, projects, and data to share. we could convene a statewide summit, where neighbor networks from across the state get together to share experiences, work through differences and trade-offs, and build a statewide vision for the public's role in protecting and restoring our state's waters.
The ultimate take-away for us is that, as citizens in a democracy, we do have the capacity – and the responsibility – to understand “public” issues (like clean water) that our individual decision-making either helps or hinders. By organizing ourselves into a network of neighbors and linking those networks across the state we can synchronize and maximize our efforts to build a more hopeful Minnesota water future.
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1773 days ago | |
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1775 days ago | |
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1775 days ago | |
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1776 days ago | |
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1778 days ago | |
Janna Caywood updated this Competition Entry. - 1778 days ago | |
Katina Petersen said: I'm impressed by how much you've thought about sustainability and growth. Great thinking, Janna! about this Competition Entry. - 1778 days ago read more > | |
Janna Caywood submitted this idea. - 1778 days ago |
Take action: |
||
discuss |
share this entry |
|
Like this (1 like) |